AI-Assisted Application Modernization Services

Move your legacy systems to a modern, scale-ready platform without a risky big-bang rewrite.

Aging applications hold the business back long before they fail. They cost more to run each quarter, resist new integrations, and make it hard to hire for the stack underneath them. Yet the fear of a full rewrite that breaks a running business keeps many teams paying to stand still.
Cabot delivers application and software modernization services that move you off that plateau one deliberate step at a time. We assess your application portfolio, choose the right approach for each application, and update it incrementally so the system keeps running while it improves. AI speeds the slow parts of the work, reading undocumented legacy code, drafting tests, and proposing refactors, while senior engineers make every architectural call. You reach a modern, secure, cloud-ready platform on a path you can see from the start.

Legacy · Cloud · Microservices · Data · APIs | Security and compliance ready

Assess your legacy system

Tell us what you are running today and we will send back a modernization assessment.

No obligation. Your details stay private.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

What is application modernization, and what does it change?

Application modernization is the process of updating older software, its architecture, and the platform it runs on, so it fits current business needs without being rebuilt from scratch. It ranges from moving an application to the cloud as it stands, to restructuring it into modern services, to replacing a component with a better-fitting one. The same approach applies to software product modernization, where a commercial product's code and architecture are brought up to date while customers keep using it. The goal is a system that costs less to run, integrates cleanly, scales when demand grows, and meets the security standards your market now expects. Done well, it is an incremental path that keeps the application working the whole way through, so the business never goes dark while the technology underneath it improves.

Why staying on legacy systems costs more than modernizing

Most legacy systems do not fail outright. They quietly get more expensive, harder to change, and riskier to run, until the cost of standing still passes the cost of moving. Naming where that happens makes the case plain.

3p

Maintenance eats the budget. A large share of spend goes to keeping old systems alive, leaving little for the work that moves the business forward.

receipt

The architecture caps growth. A monolith that once served the load now strains under it, and scaling means paying for the whole thing at once.

dataset

Integration gets harder. Modern tools and partners expect clean APIs, and an older system without them turns every connection into a custom project.

circle_notifications

Security exposure grows. Unsupported frameworks and unpatched dependencies widen the attack surface and complicate every audit.

radio_button_checked

The talent pool shrinks. Fewer engineers know the older stack each year, so hiring slows and knowledge concentrates in a few people.

tag

Release velocity drops. Change becomes slow and risky, so the business waits weeks for what a modern codebase would ship in days.

The application modernization services we deliver

Every service below is scoped against your actual application portfolio and delivered with AI across the slow, repetitive stages, so you move faster without losing control of quality. As an application modernization company and software modernization partner in the USA, we cover the full path from assessment to a running modern system.

What does application modernization actually cost?

Modernization cost tracks with how many applications you move, the approach each one needs, and how much of the work can be automated, not a fixed package price. We scope it up front against your application portfolio, so you are never signing a blank check. Get a quick figure in minutes, then talk to an engineer about your specifics.

How AI shortens a modernization that used to take years

The slowest part of modernizing an old system is understanding it. Documentation is missing, the original authors have moved on, and the business rules live only in the code. This is where AI earns its place. Done well, AI-assisted delivery compresses the reading, testing, and repetitive rewriting that once stretched projects out, without handing your architecture to a machine.

data_exploration

Faster code comprehension

AI reads through undocumented legacy code and surfaces how it works and what it depends on, so the team spends days mapping the system instead of months.

code

Faster documentation recovery

AI drafts the missing documentation and data-flow maps from the code itself, giving your team and ours a shared picture to work from.

adb

Faster test coverage

AI generates tests around the current behavior before anything changes, so the team can refactor with a safety net rather than crossed fingers.

emoji_objects

Faster refactoring

AI proposes the repetitive structural changes and language migrations, which our engineers review and correct before any of it merges.

This is AI used to move your applications forward faster. If the product you are building needs AI or machine learning as a feature in its own right, our AI development services team leads that work.

Legacy stack we modernize from

Web and enterprise

PHP
Classic ASP
.NET Framework
Legacy Java
Perl
Python 2

Desktop and client server

Visual Basic 6
Delphi
PowerBuilder
Visual FoxPro
Oracle Forms
Microsoft Access

Mainframe and data

COBOL
RPG on IBM i
PL/SQL
T-SQL
MUMPS
JCL
Running one of these systems?

Tell us the language and the platform. We will tell you the least disruptive path off it and what that path takes.

Get a legacy system review

The target stack and AI tooling behind your modernization

Two questions come up in every scoping call: what will my system run on once you are done, and what exactly is the AI doing along the way. We match the target stack to your applications rather than forcing a house standard, and we show where AI sits in the process so nothing about the work is a black box.

Target stack

Application and front end

React
Next.js
TypeScript
Angular
.NET
Java Spring

Services and data

Node.js
Python
Microservices
PostgreSQL
MongoDB
REST & GraphQL

Cloud and delivery

AWS
Azure
Google Cloud
Docker
Kubernetes
CI/CD pipelines

Where AI sits in the work

AI is applied to specific, bounded stages of modernization. It does not decide your architecture and it does not ship unreviewed code.
Stage
What AI does
What stays human
Tools Used
Assessment
What AI does
Reads legacy code, maps dependencies, and drafts the missing documentation into a structured view of the system.
What stays human
The modernization approach chosen per application, and the roadmap that follows.
Tools Used
Claude, OpenAI GPT models, Google Gemini
Refactoring
What AI does
Proposes structural changes, language and framework migrations, and repetitive rewrites for review.
What stays human
Architecture, data modeling, and approval of every change before it merges.
Tools Used
GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code
Migration
What AI does
Generates configuration, infrastructure code, and data-mapping scripts for the move to the target platform.
What stays human
Cutover planning, rollback design, and the go or no-go call.
Tools Used
Terraform, Docker, Kubernetes
Testing
What AI does
Produces regression tests around current behavior and drafts edge cases before code changes.
What stays human
Test strategy, acceptance criteria, and manual exploratory testing.
Tools Used
Jest, PyTest, Playwright, Selenium
Code review and security
What AI does
Flags vulnerabilities, dependency risks and quality issues on every pull request before a human looks.
What stays human
The merge decision, architectural review, and the security model itself.
Tools Used
SonarQube, Snyk, CodeQL, Dependabot
Post-migration optimization
What AI does
Turns runtime and usage data into candidate improvements for the next iteration.
What stays human
What actually goes on the roadmap, and why.
Tools Used
Claude, Cloud monitoring tooling

How we choose and govern the tooling

We stay model-neutral. No vendor is baked into your product, and the model layer can be swapped without a rebuild. Where a tool touches your codebase, it runs inside our controlled environment rather than on a public endpoint.
Three rules apply to every engagement. Your code and data are not used to train third-party models. Nothing reaches your repository without human review and approval. Where your product handles regulated data, that data stays in your environment rather than passing through our AI-assisted workflows.

Which modernization approach is right for each application?

There is no single path here, and the wrong choice wastes budget. We map every application to one of six recognized approaches, the six Rs, based on its business value, its condition, and what you need from it next. Here is what each one means and when we recommend it.

Approach
What it means
When Cabot recommends it
Rehost
Move the application to the cloud as it stands, with no code changes.
You need out of a data center quickly and the application itself is still fit for purpose.
Replatform
Keep the core intact but make targeted changes to use cloud capabilities.
The application works but would run cheaper and steadier on managed cloud services.
Refactor
Restructure the code toward modern, cloud-native patterns without changing what it does.
A high-value application is worth keeping but its codebase is holding you back.
Rearchitect
Reshape the application, often from a monolith into independent services.
Scaling, release speed, or resilience matter and the current shape cannot deliver them.
Rebuild
Rewrite the application from the ground up on a modern foundation.
The business logic is worth keeping but the existing code is beyond economical repair.
Replace
Retire the application and move to a commercial or SaaS product.
A mature product already does the job and a custom build no longer earns its keep.
Not sure which approach fits?

Share your application list. We will map each one to a path, from rehost to replace, and show you the trade offs before you commit.

Get an approach recommendation

Built for the way your industry is judged

Different markets weigh these projects by different rules, so we build for the one you operate in. These are the sectors we work in most often.

Built to pass review from users, auditors, and security teams

A modernization is worth nothing if the result cannot pass review. We build current security controls into the work rather than bolting them on afterward, so the finished system can face users, auditors, and security teams without another round of rework.

Which standards apply depends on the market you operate in. The security practices below apply to every engagement. The regulatory items apply where your system handles the data they govern, and we scope that with you during assessment.

For systems that handle health data, we build to HIPAA standards, and your regulated data stays in your environment rather than passing through our AI-assisted workflows. To understand the standard itself, see the official HIPAA guidance.

Encryption in transit & at rest
Role-based access control
Audit logging
OWASP secure coding
NDA & full IP ownership
GDPR
HIPAA
SOC 2 aligned
HL7 & FHIR

How Do We Analyze, Migrate and Test Your Applications Without Stopping the Business?

The work runs in three phases, analyze, migrate and test, across six steps. A decision point sits at every step and your current system keeps running throughout.

explore

1. Analyze the application portfolio

We catalog every application and its dependencies, with AI reading the code, so you decide what to move first with a full picture rather than a hunch.

lightbulb

2. Prioritize by risk and value

Together we rank applications by business value and risk, so you decide what moves first and what can wait.

code

3. Choose the approach and roadmap

We match each system to one of the six Rs and sequence the work into a phased roadmap. You decide the path and the order, knowing the cost and disruption of each.

rocket

4. Migrate in increments

We move one piece at a time in short cycles, with AI assisting the code and engineers reviewing every change. You decide when each increment is ready for production, and the current system stays live.

check_circle

5. Test at every increment

We build regression tests around current behavior before anything changes, then add manual and exploratory testing, so each piece is proven before it ships. You set the acceptance criteria.

support_agent

6. Cut over, measure, and optimize

We move to the new system on a planned cutover with a rollback ready, then tune it on real runtime data.

Start with an application review

A short review of your applications and dependencies shows what to move first and what waiting will cost.

Book your application review

The team that carries the risk of your modernization

Modernization goes wrong when nobody owns the whole picture. A solutions architect owns the target architecture and the approach chosen for each application. Senior engineers own the refactoring and migration, and review every AI-proposed change before it merges. A QA lead owns the tests that prove the new system behaves like the old one where it should, and better where it counts. A delivery lead owns the sequence and keeps the business informed at each cutover.

Our depth shows in four specific places. We are strong at pulling business rules out of undocumented legacy code. We are strong at breaking monoliths into services without breaking the workflows on top of them. We are strong at moving data between systems without loss. And we are strong at updating regulated systems where uptime and compliance cannot slip. We do not claim to be equally deep in everything, and we will tell you where a specialist fits better.

We work as an extension of your team, not a black box down the hall. You see the roadmap, the decision points, and the progress, and you own the code and the IP from the first commit. When you need more hands as the work scales, you can add forward-deployed engineers to the same team rather than starting over with a new one.

Why technology leaders choose Cabot for AI-assisted application modernization

Speed only helps if what you ship is solid. Cabot pairs an AI-assisted build with senior engineers who own the architecture, so your system moves forward fast and stands up once it gets there.
Get a modernization assessment

Senior engineers review your applications and send back a clear roadmap, with the approach, sequence, and risks for every application.

Request your assessment

Client Success Stories

See all Cabot case studies

Where to go next, depending on where you are

Modernization is one part of a wider product engineering practice. Wherever you are, there is a next step.

Our Clients

Frequently Asked Questions
What is application modernization?

Application modernization is the process of updating older software, its architecture, and the platform it runs on, so it meets current business needs without a full rebuild. It ranges from moving an application to the cloud as it stands, to restructuring it into modern services, to replacing a component with a better-fitting product. The aim is a system that costs less to run, integrates cleanly, and scales when you need it to.

How much does application modernization cost?

Cost tracks with how many applications you move, the approach each one needs, and how much of the work can be automated. We scope it up front against your application portfolio, so you are not signing a blank check. For a quick figure, try our Cost Calculator.

How long does application modernization take?

It depends on the size of the application portfolio and the approach each application needs. Because we work in increments rather than one big rewrite, you see the first modernized piece in production early, often within weeks, while larger portfolios roll out in planned phases.

Which modernization approach is right for us?

We map each application to one of six approaches, the six Rs: rehost, replatform, refactor, rearchitect, rebuild, or replace. The right one depends on the application's business value, its condition, and what you need from it next. The assessment produces that recommendation per system.

Will modernization disrupt our running operations?

Our approach is built to avoid that. We keep the current system live and work in increments, proving each piece before it goes into production, and we plan every cutover with a rollback ready.

Can you turn a monolith into microservices?

Yes. We rearchitect monolithic applications into services that deploy and scale independently, and we do it in stages so the application keeps working as the structure changes underneath it.

Which legacy languages and platforms do you modernize?

We modernize applications written in .NET Framework, legacy Java, PHP, Classic ASP, Perl, Visual Basic 6, Delphi, PowerBuilder, COBOL, RPG on IBM i, PL/SQL and MUMPS, among others. For .NET and Java systems, we move you to current versions or cloud services. For every language, we recover the business rules and documentation from the code with AI assistance, then choose the least disruptive path to a modern platform.

How does AI help with application modernization?

AI speeds the slowest parts of the work: reading undocumented legacy code, recovering missing documentation, generating tests around current behavior, and proposing repetitive refactors. Senior engineers review every AI-proposed change before it merges.

What technology stack do you modernize to?

We match the target stack to your applications rather than forcing one on you. Common choices include React, Next.js, Angular, and TypeScript on the front end, Node.js, Python, .NET, or Java on the services layer, PostgreSQL or MongoDB for data, and AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud, configured to the standards your market requires.